UK Specialty Training Competition Ratios 2026: CT1/ST1 and Higher Specialty Training

Explore the latest official 2026 CT1/ST1 competition ratios, compare them with 2025, and see the most recent available ST3/ST4 figures. We explain what the numbers mean for 2027 applicants, how prioritisation changes recruitment and what you can do to prepare.

The 2026 entry-level specialty data are now available. The higher specialty ST3/ST4 table still uses 2025 data, clearly labelled, until official 2026 figures are published.

Author: Olivier Picard | Updated: 23 October 2026 | Sources: NHS England and Oriel | CT1/ST1: 2026; ST3/ST4: 2025


UK doctor pondering over the meaning of competition ratios for CT and ST applications.

Competition ratios – key takeaways

  • 2026 specialty-level figures are now available. NHS England has published application numbers, training posts and competition ratios for 22 Round 1 CT1/ST1 recruitment categories. The 2026 ratios for several major specialties are lower than in 2025.
  • Applications are not individual doctors. In Round 1, 39,387 people submitted 78,735 applications for 10,682 posts. That equates to 3.69 individual applicants, but approximately 7.37 applications, per post overall. Specialty rows show applications per post.
  • Prioritisation changes what the ratios mean. In 2026 it applied to offers; in most 2027 specialty recruitment it also applies to interview invitations. Priority status, ranking and location preferences can all affect the outcome.
  • Good preparation still matters. The ratios describe demand, not your personal likelihood of appointment. Meet the eligibility requirements, maximise the marks available and prepare for your specialty's selection process.

What do competition ratios actually tell you?

A competition ratio tells us how many applications were received for each advertised specialty training post. A figure of 8:1 means eight applications for every post; it does not mean that every doctor has an identical one-in-eight chance of receiving an offer.

Doctors often apply to several specialties, some withdraw during recruitment and others decline offers. Candidates also differ in eligibility, self-assessment scores, assessment performance, interview results and geographical preferences. Since the introduction of prioritisation, the overall application count may include doctors who are considered at different stages of the offers process.

Applications versus applicants: the crucial distinction

For 2026 Round 1, NHS England reports 39,387 individual applicants and 10,682 posts, equivalent to 3.69 applicants per post. Those applicants submitted 78,735 applications, equivalent to approximately 7.37 applications per post. The specialty tables use the second measure. A doctor applying to IMT, GP and Psychiatry contributes an application to each of those specialty totals.

What the ratio does not measure

The ratio does not show an applicant's probability of passing shortlisting, achieving an appointable interview score or receiving an offer in their preferred region. Nor does it show how many people would actually accept the post. It is best used as an indicator of demand and compared with other recruitment information, not as a standalone forecast of success.

Source: NHS England – official 2026 competition ratios.

2026 CT1/ST1 competition ratios by specialty

These are the 2026 Round 1 competition ratios published by NHS England, covering 22 separately advertised recruitment categories. They are ordered from lowest to highest ratio, making it easy to locate the less and more heavily subscribed programmes. Some Scotland-only and Northern Ireland-only routes appear separately; they should not automatically be added to another row for the same broad specialty.

On a phone, swipe horizontally across the table to see every column. All entries are real text, rather than an image, so the specialty names and figures can be selected, searched and read by assistive technology.

CT1/ST1 competition ratios (2026)
Specialty Applications Posts Ratio
Oral and Maxillo Facial Surgery ST1 64 19 3.37:1
General Practice ST1 24,014 5,064 4.74:1
Internal Medicine Training CT1 8,468 1,683 5.03:1
Paediatrics ST1 2,605 508 5.13:1
Core Surgical Training CT1 4,975 720 6.91:1
Internal Medicine Training (Scotland) CT1 885 124 7.14:1
Histopathology ST1 681 79 8.62:1
Clinical Radiology ST1 2,849 327 8.71:1
Ophthalmology ST1 1,141 115 9.92:1
Obstetrics and Gynaecology ST1 3,532 354 9.98:1
Anaesthetics CT1 5,766 547 10.54:1
ACCS Emergency Medicine ST1 4,410 357 12.35:1
Cardiothoracic Surgery ST1 202 14 14.43:1
Core Psychiatry Training CT1 11,940 552 21.63:1
Public Health Medicine ST1 2,241 100 22.41:1
Neurosurgery ST1 378 16 23.63:1
Core Surgical Training (Northern Ireland) CT1 1,013 42 24.12:1
Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery (Scotland) ST1 494 14 35.29:1
General Practice and Public Health Medicine (Dual CCT Programme) ST1 800 13 61.54:1
Broad Based Training (Scotland) CT1 926 15 61.73:1
Community Sexual and Reproductive Health ST1 583 9 64.78:1
Emergency Medicine (Northern Ireland) ST1 768 10 76.80:1

Source: NHS England – Competition ratios for 2026 (page last reviewed 21 October 2026). Ratios are based on applications divided by posts, rounded to two decimal places.

What changed between 2025 and 2026?

All 17 directly corresponding categories recorded lower headline ratios in 2026 than in 2025. Among the larger entry routes, Ophthalmology fell from 21.54:1 to 9.92:1 and Obstetrics and Gynaecology from 16.65:1 to 9.98:1. The changes in some small or dual-programme categories were even larger.

However, these figures should not be interpreted as meaning that a particular applicant is now twice as likely to receive an offer. A lower ratio can reflect fewer applications, more posts or both; recruitment rules, priority status and programme preferences also matter.

Directly comparable CT1/ST1 specialties: 2025 versus 2026
Specialty 2025 2026 Change (ratio points)
ACCS Emergency Medicine ST1 14.23:1 12.35:1 ▼ 1.88
Anaesthetics CT1 12.56:1 10.54:1 ▼ 2.02
Cardiothoracic Surgery ST1 73.70:1 14.43:1 ▼ 59.27
Clinical Radiology ST1 11.27:1 8.71:1 ▼ 2.56
Community Sexual and Reproductive Health ST1 98.50:1 64.78:1 ▼ 33.72
Core Psychiatry Training CT1 21.83:1 21.63:1 ▼ 0.20
Core Surgical Training CT1 8.57:1 6.91:1 ▼ 1.66
General Practice ST1 4.91:1 4.74:1 ▼ 0.17
General Practice and Public Health Medicine (Dual CCT Programme) ST1 167.15:1 61.54:1 ▼ 105.61
Histopathology ST1 9.47:1 8.62:1 ▼ 0.85
Internal Medicine Training CT1 5.27:1 5.03:1 ▼ 0.24
Neurosurgery ST1 26.71:1 23.63:1 ▼ 3.08
Obstetrics and Gynaecology ST1 16.65:1 9.98:1 ▼ 6.67
Ophthalmology ST1 21.54:1 9.92:1 ▼ 11.62
Oral and Maxillo Facial Surgery ST1 3.50:1 3.37:1 ▼ 0.13
Paediatrics ST1 5.63:1 5.13:1 ▼ 0.50
Public Health Medicine ST1 28.53:1 22.41:1 ▼ 6.12

Change is shown in applications per post (2026 minus 2025). All 17 matching programme labels are included. The changes do not represent an individual applicant’s probability of appointment.

Which programmes had the highest 2026 ratios?

The highest published values include Emergency Medicine (Northern Ireland) ST1 (76.80:1), Community Sexual and Reproductive Health ST1 (64.78:1), Broad Based Training (Scotland) CT1 (61.73:1) and the GP/Public Health dual CCT programme (61.54:1). These are small or separately recruited programmes, so a modest change in the number of posts can produce a very large ratio.

Among larger nationwide entry programmes, Core Psychiatry Training (21.63:1) and Neurosurgery ST1 (23.63:1) remain highly subscribed. By contrast, IMT stands at 5.03:1, GP at 4.74:1 and CST at 6.91:1.

If you are applying for IMT, our separate IMT application scoring guide explains how to assess and strengthen the portfolio element of your application.

Diagram showing how UK specialty competion ratios for CT and ST posts do not provide the full picture.

Prioritisation in 2026 and 2027: what applicants need to know

The Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act 2026 changed how eligible applicants are considered for specialty training places. This is particularly important when comparing 2025 and 2026 competition ratios, or trying to predict what the next recruitment round might look like.

What happened in the 2026 recruitment round?

For 2026 recruitment, prioritisation applied at the offer stage. Selection and ranking still followed the relevant specialty rules, but appointable applicants in the priority group were considered for offers before appointable applicants outside that group. In the official Round 1 dataset, 19,908 of 39,387 applicants had priority status in at least one application; NHS England's subsequent analysis states that priority-group applicants filled 96% of CT1/ST1 posts (as at 28 September 2026).

Applicants outside the priority group could still be appointed where no appointable priority applicants remained for posts they had selected as preferences. Priority status did not override eligibility, ranking or the need to select suitable locations.

How will prioritisation work for 2027?

For most specialty recruitment processes from 2027, prioritisation applies at both interview invitation and offer stages. There are exceptions: for 2027 Round 1 Academic Clinical Fellowship (ACF) recruitment, it applies only at the offer stage, and Public Health ST1 recruitment is excluded from the Act's specialty prioritisation arrangements.

For 2027 Round 1 and Round 2 recruitment, candidates will have a maximum of five specialty applications per round. The five-application Round 1 limit was introduced in 2026; the Round 2 limit is new for 2027.

Who qualifies for the 2027 priority group?

Importantly, the additional 2027 priority criteria have now been specified in regulations laid on 14 September 2026. Priority routes include qualifying primary medical qualifications (including UK and Irish qualifications), specified relevant UK training programmes, and certain immigration or nationality statuses, including British or Irish citizenship, indefinite leave to remain and qualifying EU Settlement Scheme status. A doctor's individual circumstances and the specific specialty entry route determine which criteria apply.

For example, at CT1/ST1 the relevant qualifying UK programme is the UK Foundation Programme. At ST3/ST4, a relevant UK core or other entry training programme can qualify; the relationship between the completed programme and the higher specialty matters.

NHS England states that priority status will be shown in Oriel the day after the application deadline. If it is incorrect, applicants must seek review within the published deadline; for 2027 Round 1 this is 24 November 2026 at 17:00 UK time, and for Round 2 it is 15 December 2026 at 17:00 UK time.

Official guidance: NHS England – Prioritisation for Specialty Recruitment, Changes to 2027 recruitment, and 2026 prioritisation data.

Why do specialty training competition ratios change?

In some years, competition increases because applications grow more quickly than training capacity; in others, extra posts or fewer applications bring ratios down. Both sides of the calculation matter, particularly in small specialties where even a handful of additional places can have a substantial effect.

More applicants does not always mean more distinct doctors

Individual doctors can apply for more than one specialty, so a rise in total applications does not necessarily imply the same rise in the number of people seeking training. In 2026, Round 1 applications were capped at five per person, limiting but not eliminating this effect.

Training capacity cannot expand overnight

Creating new posts requires funding, supervisors and approved training environments. Workforce planning, regional capacity and demand for future specialists influence how many posts are offered. Expansion in one specialty may reduce its ratio, while a small programme may remain highly subscribed despite attracting far fewer individual applications.

Geography and preferencing matter

National ratios can hide important differences between the training regions applicants are willing to accept. Someone willing to train in a wider range of locations may have options unavailable to a candidate restricted to one region. NHS England's 2026 prioritisation data also show that some non-priority applicants were offered posts when higher-ranked priority applicants had not preferenced those locations.

Finally, remember that the introduction of prioritisation for 2026 occurred after applications had closed. The 2026 application figures therefore should not be treated as evidence of how doctors will choose to apply once prioritisation also affects shortlisting in 2027.

Higher Specialty Training (ST3/ST4): a second selection hurdle

Moving from CT1/ST1 into ST3/ST4 can involve another competitive recruitment process. At this stage, many candidates have several years of specialty-specific clinical experience, postgraduate examinations, teaching, quality improvement and research evidence. A lower numerical ratio at higher specialty level does not necessarily mean that selection is easy.

Core training programmes also feed several different higher specialties. An IMT trainee, for example, may pursue Cardiology, Gastroenterology, Respiratory Medicine or another physician specialty. Each has its own available post numbers and selection requirements.

Where interviews are used, candidates must demonstrate insight, judgement, communication and an understanding of the specialty. Our CT/ST and Registrar Interview Course covers preparation for this stage of recruitment.

ST3/ST4 competition ratios: latest available 2025 figures

The following table contains the 2025 ST3/ST4 competition ratios from the previously published NHS England / Oriel dataset. These are not 2026 figures. They are retained as a useful higher specialty reference while the corresponding 2026 breakdown is awaited.

On a phone, swipe horizontally to see all four columns.

Higher specialty ST3/ST4 competition ratios (2025)
Specialty Applications Posts Ratio
Emergency Medicine ST3 (ACCS) 9 11 0.82:1
Genitourinary Medicine ST4 46 45 1.02:1
Psychiatry (all specialties) ST4 683 491 1.39:1
Emergency Medicine ST4 104 71 1.46:1
Anaesthetics ST4 699 423 1.65:1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics ST4 16 8 2.00:1
Diagnostic Neuropathology ST3 8 4 2.00:1
Geriatric Medicine ST4 323 157 2.06:1
Haematology ST3 236 103 2.29:1
Chemical Pathology ST3 46 20 2.30:1
Palliative Medicine ST4 136 58 2.34:1
Clinical Oncology ST3 276 105 2.63:1
Intensive Care Medicine ST3 537 181 2.97:1
Medical Oncology ST3 319 101 3.16:1
Renal Medicine ST4 206 58 3.55:1
Neurology ST4 197 55 3.58:1
Gastroenterology ST4 383 104 3.68:1
Respiratory Medicine ST4 413 104 3.97:1
Cardiology ST4 540 134 4.03:1
Rehabilitation Medicine ST3 69 17 4.06:1
Combined Infection Training ST3 154 36 4.28:1
Acute Internal Medicine ST4 443 100 4.43:1
Stroke Medicine / General Internal Medicine ST4 145 32 4.53:1
Clinical Neurophysiology ST3 41 9 4.56:1
Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery ST3 684 150 4.56:1
Dermatology ST3 261 57 4.58:1
Urology ST3 343 74 4.64:1
Medical Ophthalmology ST3 14 3 4.67:1
Rheumatology ST4 240 51 4.71:1
Endocrinology & Diabetes Mellitus ST4 362 73 4.96:1
General Surgery ST3 834 161 5.18:1
Clinical Genetics ST3 84 15 5.60:1
Otolaryngology (ENT) ST3 243 41 5.93:1
Paediatric Cardiology ST4 63 10 6.30:1
Vascular Surgery ST3 225 35 6.43:1
Plastic Surgery ST3 281 42 6.69:1
Paediatric Surgery ST3 109 16 6.81:1
Immunology ST3 37 5 7.40:1
Obstetrics & Gynaecology ST3 504 60 8.40:1
Sport & Exercise Medicine ST3 107 12 8.92:1
Allergy ST3 29 3 9.67:1
Clinical Radiology ST3 88 9 9.78:1
Paediatrics ST3 507 49 10.35:1
Combined Infection Training ST4 112 10 11.20:1
General (Internal) Medicine ST4 191 17 11.24:1
Emergency Medicine ST3 (DRE-EM) 283 25 11.32:1
Audiovestibular Medicine ST3 32 2 16.00:1
Occupational Medicine ST3 119 7 17.00:1

Source: NHS England – Competition Ratios (2025 archive). These older figures reflect recruitment before the 2026 Act.

What stands out in higher specialty recruitment?

In the 2025 data, Occupational Medicine ST3 (17.00:1), Audiovestibular Medicine ST3 (16.00:1) and Emergency Medicine ST3 (DRE-EM) (11.32:1) are among the most heavily subscribed. Very small denominators are a major reason why some specialties report exceptionally high values.

Conversely, a low reported ratio is not an assurance of appointment. Applicants still need to meet the entry criteria and achieve appointable performance in the relevant assessments.

What can you do to improve your chances?

Published competition ratios are outside your control. Your eligibility, portfolio evidence, understanding of the selection process and interview preparation are not.

1 – Plan against the actual scoring criteria

Review the current recruitment guidance for your specialty, rather than relying on a previous year's portfolio points. Identify which achievements genuinely earn marks, what evidence is needed and whether they can be completed before the applicable deadline. For IMT applicants, see our 2027 IMT application scoring guide.

2 – Build relevant experience early

Structured teaching, quality improvement and clinical governance, leadership and research can contribute to a strong application where the published criteria recognise them. Choose activities because they are useful and relevant, not simply to accumulate certificates. Our Teach the Teacher courses provide structured training in teaching for doctors.

3 – Prepare for the selection method your specialty uses

The weighting of application, assessment and interview components varies by programme. Understand whether your specialty uses the MSRA, evidence verification, presentations, interview stations or other assessments. For IMT, our 2027 IMT interview guide explains the current format, scoring and assessment domains.

4 – Practise answering, not just reading

Timed, realistic practice and specific feedback can help you communicate evidence clearly, respond to probing questions and demonstrate your thinking. To get started, explore our CT/ST interview questions and CT/ST interview preparation tips. Doctors preparing for IMT can explore our IMT Interview Course; those applying for other training grades can explore our CT/ST and Registrar Interview Course.

5 – Be strategic about the locations you preference

Understand how the matching and preferencing process works before offers begin. If you are genuinely willing to work in more than one region, rank all acceptable locations in line with the applicable programme's rules. Do not preference a post you would be unwilling to accept merely to increase your options.

Diagram showing how candidates to CT and ST posts in the UK across all specialties can focus their preparation for CT and ST interviews on the parameters they can control.

Frequently asked questions

Some entry routes are separately advertised or recruited, and NHS England reports them as separate programmes. For example, IMT and IMT (Scotland) appear as distinct rows. Compare those rows with the relevant recruitment guidance rather than simply combining their applications and posts; regional and programme rules may differ.

In the 2026 Round 1 breakdown, a unique application means an application from someone who applied to that specialty only. NHS England reports that 59.67% of IMT CT1 applications were unique to IMT, compared with 6.45% for Core Psychiatry CT1. This helps show how much multi-specialty application behaviour differs between programmes, but does not itself measure applicant quality.

Yes. NHS England explicitly advises non-priority applicants who receive an interview invitation to attend. They can still receive offers after eligible, appointable priority-group candidates have been considered. Which locations candidates have preferenced can also influence what offers remain available.

Check the status displayed in Oriel after applications close and use NHS England’s formal review process promptly. For 2027 Round 1 the initial review deadline is 24 November 2026 at 17:00 (UK time); for Round 2 it is 15 December 2026 at 17:00. Supporting evidence may also be required. See the official review guidance rather than assuming you can correct it later.

Potentially, yes. NHS England includes relevant qualifying UK programmes among the priority criteria. At ST3/ST4, this can include the UK Foundation Programme, certain relevant Locum Appointment for Training (LAT) posts and UK training programmes that are a recognised entry route for the chosen higher specialty. The programme must meet the published specialty-specific rules; see the qualifying programme guidance.

No. In 2027 Round 1 Academic Clinical Fellowship recruitment, prioritisation applies at the offer stage only, rather than shortlisting. Public Health ST1 is excluded from the Medical Training (Prioritisation) Act’s specialty recruitment provisions. Applicants should consult the specific recruitment guidance for these routes.

Yes. A ratio counts initial applications, not the number of candidates who will eventually be eligible, appointable, willing to accept the location and available when an offer is made. Some candidates decline offers or have not included remaining locations in their preferences. NHS England’s 2026 prioritisation data specifically describes location preferences affecting offers.

NHS England has introduced a maximum of five applications for 2027 Round 2 recruitment. Round 1 also remains capped at five. Check the official 2027 recruitment changes for the latest round-specific instructions before submitting applications.

Yes. Prioritisation does not alter interview scores or the rank order produced by selection. It changes the order in which appointable candidates are considered for offers. Consequently, a non-priority candidate with a higher rank may not receive an offer where an appointable priority-group candidate can be allocated the available post. The NHS England guidance explains the matching rules.

Sources and further reading

This article distinguishes official 2026 CT1/ST1 figures from 2025 higher specialty data and uses NHS England’s current prioritisation guidance. For the latest recruitment decisions, always consult the original source:

NHS England – 2026 Competition Ratios (CT1/ST1)

NHS England – Competition Ratios: all available years

NHS England – 2026 Prioritisation Data

NHS England – Prioritisation for 2027 Specialty Recruitment

NHS England – Changes to Medical Specialty Training Recruitment for 2027

The Medical Training (Prioritisation for Specialty Training Programmes) Regulations 2026

Last reviewed: 23 October 2026. Round 1 ratios reflect NHS England’s page reviewed 21 October; prioritisation figures reflect NHS England’s 28 September snapshot. 2026 ST3/ST4 figures are not yet included.

Ready to maximise your chances?

Competition ratios tell you how many applications have been submitted, not how you will perform in selection. Thoughtful portfolio planning and interview practice can make a meaningful difference to the parts of recruitment within your control.

Applying for IMT? Explore our IMT Interview Course. Preparing for another CT, ST or registrar interview? See our CT/ST and Registrar Interview Course, or one-to-one interview coaching for tailored practice and feedback.

Still building your application portfolio? Our Teach the Teacher courses offer structured teaching-skills development, while the IMT application scoring guide helps IMT candidates plan against the current criteria.

About the author

Olivier Picard is the founder and Managing Director of ISC Medical and Course Director for all ISC Medical courses. He has been training and coaching doctors for more than 22 years and has worked with clinicians at every stage of their careers, from doctors entering specialty training through to senior clinicians applying for NHS consultant and leadership posts.

He has designed and developed ISC Medical's programmes in medical teaching, communication, leadership, management and interview skills, and has trained many of the faculty who now deliver these courses. Over that time, he has taught thousands of doctors and has continued to refine his own approach through experience, learner feedback and working alongside other experienced trainers.

Olivier is also the author of several books for doctors, including Medical Interviews: A Comprehensive Guide to CT, ST & Registrar Interview Skills, which has been published in multiple editions since 2008. His books draw on the same practical approach that underpins ISC Medical's courses, translating professional and educational principles into techniques that doctors can apply in interviews, clinical practice and their wider careers.

His approach to education is strongly practical. Rather than treating educational theory as an end in itself, he is particularly interested in how it can help doctors understand why some approaches to teaching work better than others, recognise habits that may have become established over time and adapt their teaching to different learners and clinical situations.

As Course Director, Olivier remains closely involved in the design and continuing development of ISC Medical's courses, as well as the development of its faculty. His focus is on ensuring that teaching remains engaging, evidence-informed and, above all, useful in the real situations doctors encounter when teaching, communicating, leading and supporting colleagues in clinical practice.

Loading...